|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:03 |
Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/
The FDA has effectively banned a naturally-occurring form of vitamin B6 called pyridoxamine by declaring it to be a drug, reports the American Association for Health Freedom. Responding to a petition filed by a drug company, the FDA declared pyridoxamine to be "a new drug."
Now, any nutritional supplements containing pyridoxamine will be considered adulterated and illegal by the FDA, which may raid vitamin companies and seize such products. See the history of FDA raids on vitamin companies here: http://www.naturalnews.com/021791.html
Pyridoxamine occurs naturally in fish, chicken and other foods (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_B6), putting the FDA in the strange position of banning a substance from dietary supplements even though it is already present in the food supply.
It's not the first time the FDA has declared a natural molecule to be a "drug" while attacking nutritional supplements that contain the same molecule. A similar story unfolded with red yeast rice and the lovastatin molecules it contains that lower high cholesterol. The drug companies engaged in biopiracy, ripping off the molecule from red yeast rice to make their now-famous "statin drugs." Once the statin drugs were patented, Big Pharma and the FDA went after red yeast rice, claiming the supplement was "adulterated with pharmaceuticals."
It wasn't really adulterated, of course. It just contained a natural statin-drug-like molecule that the drug companies copied and patented.
It would be like Big Pharma patenting vitamin C, then the FDA claiming that all oranges and lemons were adulterated with drugs because they naturally contain their own vitamin C.
This is the insanity of the FDA as it operates today. You can read more about the FDA on our channel webiste www.FDAreform.org which is updated every few days.
So will this ruling on pyridoxamine affect nutritional supplements? Yes, any supplements containing this form of vitamin B6 can now be declared "adulterated" by the FDA. Manufacturers of such supplements can be arrested and shut down for engaging in "illegal drug trafficking." Such is the nature of the FDA's agenda to criminalize nutritional supplement companies and limit consumers' access to Mother Nature's remedies.
The pyridoxamine "drug," by the way (which is just pyridoxamine), is designed to prevent the progression of diabetic nephrothapy (kidney disease). Most likely, the FDA will eventually approve the "drug" for that condition, even while claiming vitamin B6 supplements containing the very same chemical are useless and insert.
This is another classic oppression tactic of the FDA: Ban the herb, but promote the drug using the same chemicals. The same thing happened with ephedra, a Traditional Chinese Medicine herb known as ma huang. The FDA banned the herb, saying it was "dangerous at any dose," but pharmaceuticals containing the very same molecules (ephedrine) are still being sold over-the-counter as cold medicines, meaning they're available to any child without a prescription.
Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:02 |
Source: http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html
More and more people are becoming concerned about the shady, secretive organization that is Codex Alimentarius - the thinly-veiled propaganda arm of the international pharmaceutical industry that does everything it can to promote industry objectives whilst limiting individual options to maintain health (which would diminish mermbers profits).
Codex alimentarius is one of the major bodies behind the effort to limit access to nutritional products and information. Its motivation is not rocket science and neither is the source of its funding - money that somehow expected to return a profit to its members . . . Most of the information available regarding codex alimentarius refers to its role in the USA, but it is not a US-specific body. Far from it, Codex has wiggled its dirty little tentacles into just about every national or international body concerned with public health. Posing as a benefactor, it then uses its significant financial and political clout to do its masters bidding.
As you can read in the excellent article below, there is much to be concerned about when considering codex alimentarius - ignore it at your peril.
Codex Alimentarius - The Sinister Truth Behind Operation Cure-All
(From an original article by Ruth James)
What's really behind Operation Cure-All? Is it just the FDA and FTC taking their power too far? Or is there a deeper, more sinister purpose to this campaign? Who are Codex Alimentarius?
How could a country that prides itself in its freedom of speech, freedom of choice, and freedom of information be facing such severe restrictions in health freedom and dietary supplements? Haven't the people made their will known? Didn't our government pass the Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act of 1994 to insure our right to health supplements?
Indeed, our government did. But the FDA and FTC have found ways to get around that. The laws put in place to protect us are being ignored. And what's worse is that those laws are about to be superseded, if the powers that be have their way.
OPERATION CURE ALL IS JUST ONE MEANS TO AN END
You see, Operation Cure-All is just a tactic, a vehicle, in a much bigger overall plan. It is a result of "Codex Alimentarius" (meaning food code) -- a set of regulations that aim to outlaw any health information in connection with vitamins and limit free access to natural therapies on a worldwide scale.
WHAT'S BEHIND CODEX ALMENTARIUS?
Behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission is the United Nations and the World Health Organization working in conjunction with the multinational pharmaceutical cartel and international banks. Its initial efforts in the US with the FDA were defeated, so it found another ally in the FTC. Now Codex, with the FTC and the pharmaceutical cartel behind it, it threatens to become a trade issue, using the campaign of Operation Cure-All to advance its goals.
Codex began simply enough when the U.N. authorized the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization to develop a universal food code. Their purpose was to 'harmonize' regulations for dietary supplements worldwide and set international safety standards for the purposes of increased trade. Pharmaceutical interests stepped in and began exerting their influence. Instead of focusing on food safety, Codex is using its power to promote worldwide restrictions on vitamins and food supplements, severely limiting their availability and dosages.
REAL GOALS OF CODEX
This is to bring about international 'harmonization.' While global harmony sounds benign, is that the real purpose of this plan? While the stated goal of Codex is to establish unilateral regulations for dietary supplements in every country, the actual goal is to outlaw health products and information on vitamins and dietary supplements, except those under their direct control. These regulations would supersede United States domestic laws without the American people's voice or vote in the matter.
HOW CAN IT BE POSSIBLE?
Americans gasp at the thought. It goes against everything America stands for. Many believe this can't be possible. The truth is, it's not only possible, it's required by the Codex Alimentarius agreement.
In fact, under the terms of the Uruguay Round of GATT, which created the World Trade Organization, the United States agreed to harmonize its domestic laws to the international standards. This includes standards for dietary supplements being developed by the United Nation's Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Use.
The Uruguay Round Agreements carry explicit language clearly indicating that the U.S. must harmonize to international standards:
"Members are fully responsible under this Agreement for the observance of all provisions.... members shall formulate and implement positive measures and mechanisms in support of the observance of the provisions.... by other than central government bodies." [WTO TBT Agreement at Article 3.5]"
In other words, the federal government must NOT ONLY CHANGE FEDERAL LAW, but must ALSO require state and local governments to change their laws as well to be in accordance with international law.
Not only that, but Codex Alimentarius is now enforceable through the World Trade Organization (WTO). If a country disagrees with or refuses to follow Codex standards, the WTO applies pressure by withdrawing trade privileges and imposing crippling trade sanctions. Congress has already bowed to this pressure several times and so have the governments of many countries.
While the exemption clause (USC 3512(a)(1) and (a)(2) was created to supposedly protect our laws from harmonization to international standards, it has proven to be totally ineffective. The United States has already lost seven trade disputes despite the exemption clause. Due to the enormous pressures put on them by lobbyists from multinational corporations (who contribute millions to congressional campaigns), Congress bowed to pressure and changed U.S. laws.
It appears our government (as well as al others) is being manipulated one way or another to serve the goals of the UN, the World Health Organization and the World Trade Organization. Food control equals people control -- and population control. Is this beginning to sound like world government and one-world order? Could this be the real goal behind Codex Alimentarius?
The United States, Canada, the Europeans, Japan, most of Asia, and South America have already signed agreements pledging total harmonization of their laws including food and drug laws to these international standards in the future.
WHAT CODEX WILL BRING
What can we expect under Codex? To give you an idea, here are some important points:
* Dietary supplements could not be sold for preventive (prophylactic) or therapeutic use.
* Potencies would be limited to extremely low dosages. Only the drug companies and the big phytopharmaceutical companies would have the right to produce and sell the higher potency products (at inflated prices).
* Prescriptions would be required for anything above the extremely low doses allowed (such as 35 mg. on niacin).
* Common foods such as garlic and peppermint would be classified as drugs or a third category (neither food nor drugs) that only big pharmaceutical companies could regulate and sell. Any food with any therapeutic effect can be considered a drug, even benign everyday substances like water.
* Codex regulations for dietary supplements would become binding (escape clauses would be eliminated).
* All new dietary supplements would be banned unless they go through Codex testing and approval.
* Genetically altered food would be sold worldwide without labeling.
According to John Hammell, a legislative advocate and the founder of International Advocates for Health Freedom (IAHF), here is what we have to look forward to:
"If Codex Alimentarius has its way, then herbs, vitamins, minerals, homeopathic remedies, amino acids and other natural remedies you have taken for granted most of your life will be gone. The name of the game for Codex Alimentarius is to shift all remedies into the prescription category so they can be controlled exclusively by the medical monopoly and its bosses, the major pharmaceutical firms. Predictably, this scenario has been denied by both the Canadian Health Food Association and the Health Protection Branch of Canada (HPB).
The Codex Alimentarius proposals already exist as law in Norway and Germany where the entire health food industry has literally been taken over by the drug companies. In these countries, vitamin C above 200 mg is illegal as is vitamin E above 45 IU, vitamin B1 over 2.4 mg and so on. Shering-Plough, the Norway pharmaceutical giant, now controls an Echinacea tincture, which is being sold there as an over the counter drug at grossly inflated prices. The same is true of ginkgo and many other herbs, and only one government controlled pharmacy has the right to import supplements as medicines which they can sell to health food stores, convenience stores or pharmacies."
It is now a criminal offence in parts of Europe to sell herbs as foods. An agreement called EEC6565 equates selling herbs as foods to selling other illegal drugs. Action is being taken to accelerate other European countries into 'harmonization' as well.
Paul Hellyer in his book, "The Evil Empire," states: "Codex Alimentarius is supported by international banks and multinational corporations including some in Canada, and is in reality a bill of rights for these banks and the corporations they control. It will hand over our sovereign rights concerning who may or may not invest in our countries to an unelected world organization run by big business. The treaty would make it impossible for Canadian legislators either federal or provincial to alter or improve environmental standards for fear of being sued by multinational corporations whether operating in Canada or not.
This will create a world without borders ruled by a virtual dictatorship of the world's most powerful central banks and multinational companies. This world is an absolute certainty if we all sit on our hands and do nothing."
This is the future the FDA and FTC are striving to bring us via Codex harmonization. Is this a future we are going to willingly accept or prevent?
WHY TARGET THE INTERNET?
It is no accident that the FDA and FTC are targeting Internet health sites through Operation Cure-All. We are standing in the doorway of an unprecedented revolution -- the information revolution brought about by the Internet.
Now all people everywhere have the ability to learn about anything that interests them with just a few clicks. History has shown that informed, educated people change civilizations -- they change the flow of thought and they change the flow of money. They can even change the direction of a country. When similar transitions have happened in the past, the powers that existed did not give up willingly. The Catholic Church fiercely protected its practice of selling 'indulgences' as a forgiveness of sin. When the practice was abolished, the Catholic Church lost a great deal of power and money.
When the printing press was invented, books were banned and printers were imprisoned by the authorities, who feared an educated public could not be governed. In the same way, the medical monopoly (and the UN) now fears that a public educated in health and privy to the shortcomings of modern medicine could not be controlled. Loss of control means loss of revenue and loss of power. And they are doing everything they can to stop progress so they can contain their losses and strengthen their power.
The printing press changed the world. Can you imagine what life would be like today if the book banners had their way? But because the printing press won out, society progressed and freedom was embraced. The Internet is changing the world in an equally significant way. While the entire Internet can hardly be suppressed, the pharma-cartels and their backers are looking to protect their interests by restricting as much information as they can on the Internet.
Will we, the people, win out again -- or will the UN and the World Health Organization agenda and the pharmaceutical cartel change the course of history and take us back to the "dark ages" of medicine?
WHAT CAN WE DO?
Step number one is learn as much as possible about this issue. Here are some websites where you will find a great deal of information:
John Hammell's International Advocates for Health Freedom
website: http://www.iahf.com
"The Health Movement Against Codex Alimentarius" - article from Dr. Rath's website: http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/PHARMACEUTICAL_BUSINESS/health_movement_against_codex/index.htm#top
'U.S. and European Leaders Agree on Principles to Harmonize Dietary Supplement Regulations: 'http://www.crnusa.org/shellnr112000.html
Federal Register where the FDA states its intention to harmonize with Codex standards: http://iahf.com/codx-fda.txt
Read, "WHOSE TRADE ORGANIZATION? Corporate Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy" by By Lori Wallach and Michelle Sforza,
Public Citizens Global Trade Watch:
http://www.tradewatch.org/publications/wtobook.htm
Sign the petition - Click on 'Sign Health Freedom Petition:'
http://www.iahf.com/index2.html
Also sign the European Anti-Codex petition at: www.laleva.cc
Signing petitions is fine, but not nearly as effective as writing to your congressmen and congresswomen. Write to them insisting we hold a PROPER Oversight Hearing on Codex. An oversight hearing was held in March, but the truth was not allowed to come out. Witness who could have exposed what was going on, and who wanted to testify, were denied the opportunity to testify. Congress is strongly resisting another Codex hearing, telling their constituents it is not necessary. This could not be further from the truth.
Contact information for representatives: http://www.house.gov
Contact information for senators: http://www.senate.gov
Copyright 2001 Ruth James
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
www.therealessentials.com
CTM Comment: Codex is of course the single most virulent assault on human freedoms in recent times. The desire to control of vitamins, minerals, herbs and other nutritional factors has ironically come about as a result of the inability of orthodox medicine to destroy the practice of the public practicing health without drugs. Now government and the chemical industry will seek to control and profit from that which was available directly to the public in times gone by.
Overturning the Codex by a mass public backlash is CTM’s sworn goal. This can be accomplished only with large numbers of the public all committed to this endeavor. As the above article states, the Internet itself has been able to grant access to information freely to anyone seeking it, and this has destabilized the flow of money and profits to institutions which have traditionally believed their highly lucrative monopolies to be safe. There can be no more pressing reason to join the Campaign for Truth in Medicine for FREE than to assist us in pressuring for the scrapping of Codex.
For more information go to: http://www.campaignfortruth.com
Source: http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:01 |
Source: http://www.doomdaily.com/2009/a-cure-for-cancer-but-your-not-being-told-about-it-dca/
Did you know there has been a cure for most cancers available for a few years now? If you didn’t know that you have to ask why you don’t. Is it more media manipulation and profits that really run the medical world?
The only Doom in this article is for the Big Pharmacutical Companies profits so please spread this to everyone you know as everyone needs to know about it.
Cancer remains the main cause of death in both men and women and those that find a cure would be made into Gods. Of course there are a lot of expensive drugs and treatments out there to slow down the effects and also to boost the big drug companies coffers, it makes you wonder if these big companies will ever truly “develop” a miracle cure. Well actually the cure for most cancers is already out there and has been for sometime but they will not tell you that!
Before we get into the cures lets look at why they wont tell us the truth, here’s a hint – Its all about MONEY.
· In general, oncologists make money by providing chemotherapy, even when it has little chance of success.
· “There’s pretty good evidence at this point,” said Dr. Richard Deyo, professor of medicine at the University of Washington and an expert on health care spending, “that there are plenty of patients for whom there’s little hope, who are terminally ill, whom chemotherapy is not going to help, who get chemotherapy.”
· Ari Straus, the chief operating officer of Aurora Healthcare Consulting, which works with doctors to increase their profits, said Medicare’s changes had squeezed oncologists. “Five years ago, many physicians were earning over $1 million per year on drug sales alone,” Mr. Straus said.
· Dr. Robert Geller, who worked as an oncologist in private practice from 1996 to 2005 said that as long as oncologists continue to be paid by the procedure instead of for spending time with patients, they will find ways to game the system, however much money they make or lose on prescribing drugs. “People go where the money is, and you’d like to believe it’s different in medicine, but it’s really no different in medicine,” Dr. Geller said. “When you start thinking of oncology as a business, then all these decisions make sense.”
That’s just a small sample from doctors. Many people believe that pharmaceutical companies’ hunger for profits triumphs over their desire to genuinely help the public, and that this blinded concern for profit above all has shaped — and continues to shape — mainstream medicine as we know it. This has implications that are more serious than one might initially think, especially considering the heavy role that pharmaceutical companies play in mainstream medicine. “Deep Healing” author Dr. Emmette Miller writes, “We have to remember that most medical research in this country is financed by pharmaceutical companies who are looking for new drugs they can produce and sell.
The research on this is massive but lets get to the point. Just have a look at some of the big names set to profit from TAMIFLU – Cheney, Rumsfeld….. what more needs to be said! It shows you that things are manipulated.
The Cure for most Cancers.
Dichloroacetic Acid – DCA
It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.
Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.
DCA attacks a unique feature of cancer cells: the fact that they make their energy throughout the main body of the cell, rather than in distinct organelles called mitochondria. This process, called glycolysis, is inefficient and uses up vast amounts of sugar.
Until now it had been assumed that cancer cells used glycolysis because their mitochondria were irreparably damaged. However, Michelakis’s experiments prove this is not the case, because DCA reawakened the mitochondria in cancer cells. The cells then withered and died.
Dichloroacetic acid, often abbreviated DCA, is a chemical compound, an acid, and an analogue of acetic acid in which two of the three hydrogen atoms of the methyl group have been replaced by chlorine atoms.
DCA can cause pain, numbness and gait disturbances in some patients, but this may be a price worth paying if it turns out to be effective against all cancers. The next step is to run clinical trials of DCA in people with cancer. These may have to be funded by charities, universities and governments: pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to pay because they can’t make money on unpatented medicines.
The pay-off is that if DCA does work, it will be easy to manufacture and dirt cheap. DCA is non-patentable as a compound, though a patent has been filed for its use in cancer treatment.
Get your google out and get the full facts behind DCA, everyone should know about it.
Source: http://www.doomdaily.com/2009/a-cure-for-cancer-but-your-not-being-told-about-it-dca/
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:01 |
Source: http://nhppa.org/
At this point almost 60% of Natural Health Product license applications have been either refused or withdrawn. These are primarily license applications for single ingredient products. The NHPPA expects that the percentage of license refusals will increase as the NHPD starts considering multi-ingredient products. In short, the industry will remain largely illegal, or the majority of NHPs will have to be taken off of the market.
Innovation on new products is grinding to a halt. Small and medium sized manufacturers are being driven out of business.
Eventually cost recovery for the NHPD will put further strain on the industry and consumer access to Natural Health Products.
On April 8, 2008, the Minister of Health introduced Bill C-51 into the House of Commons. The Bill passed first reading.
Bill C-51 changes the legal landscape for the natural health product industry. For the first time, manufacturers, retailers, distributors and natural health practitioners face personal bankruptcy if they cross Health Canada. Directors and officers of corporations are not protected as the the Bill makes them personally liable and hence subject to personal bankruptcy for any breach of the Act and Regulations by the corporation.
Bill C-51 provides Health Canada with unprecedented powers such as the power to seize and detain product, equipment and property for any reason and for any length of time. Health Canada is also given the power to destroy seized property without Court supervision.
Although the Natural Health Product industry is facing an immediate threat with the imposition of the drug-style NHP Regulations, there are other threats lurking in the background. These threats include:
* international treaties Canada and the United States are participating in such as CODEX;
* the imposition of ever stricter standards upon the industry by Health Canada and the Food and Drug Administration in the United States;
* the seizure of products at the border between the United States and Canada. Currently, the main problem is U.S. products entering Canada. However, with the imposition of stricter standards on dietary supplements by the F.D.A., there is a real risk that the F.D.A. will adopt the Health Canada approach of stopping products at the border;
* the imposition of ever-widening intellectual property right agreements and treaties that will affect the Natural Health Product industry.
Stakeholders are currently not being kept up to date on these issues. The NHPPA is well placed to keep its stakeholders informed on all issues that threaten their interests.
Source: http://nhppa.org/
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:00 |
Source: http://www.fdainformation.com/
Innocent Casualties exposes the Food and Drug Administration’s attempts to deny Americans access to nutritional products, including banning certain nutrients widely used in other countries and attempting to have vitamins classified as prescription drugs.
In 1989, the FDA stopped a promising AIDS nutritional therapy to protect the interests of the pharmaceutical companies (see Innocent Casualties for documentation). Innocent Casualties documents a government agency so radical that, in 1992, its agents burst into a doctor’s office – guns drawn – to seize vitamins and herbs.
In 1999, the orthodox medical establishment is still promoting misinformation about the safety and effectiveness of alternative treatments at the expense of public health. It is profit that is threatened, not science. Through research and eye-witness narrative, Elaine Feuer raises the question of whether the American medical establishment has evolved into an "undercover dictatorship."
On July 14, 1989, True Health announced the results of their clinical AIDS trial at a press conference held at the Dallas-Fort Worth Medical Center. Although True Health had just reached the mid-point of its 180-day study, the nutritional company decided to go public with its findings since each patient had shown such remarkable improvement in their condition. The implications of the study--that by boosting the body's natural immune system with a non-toxic nutritional supplement, AIDS patients could enter into long-term remission--were too important to stay silent. A few weeks after the press conference, FDA agents Joel Martinez and Ken Davis visited True Health's corporate offices. Despite his previous dealings with the FDA, Stokley assumed the FDA agents had come to congratulate True Health, that after examining the materials True Health had sent them--a videotape of the press conference and documentation confirming the test results--the FDA would provide federal assistance at this critical juncture.
Yet, instead of wanting to expand on valuable research that warranted further investigation, the Food and Drug Administration was prepared to do everything in its power to shut True Health down. FDA agents Martinez and Davis presented Stokley with a Notice of Investigation: Martinez, an investigator with the Dallas FDA, led the formal questioning, while Davis, a FDA official with the Texas Department of Health, chimed in on occasion. Robert Williams, Vice President of True Health, was in the room with Stokley during the entire interrogation.
Stokley reminded the agents that True Health had already sent the FDA a videotape and press kit describing the AIDS test. He told them he did not want the FDA as adversaries, that he needed their support in order to make a final determination on the validity of True Health's AIDS test. "Anything you want or need, just ask us and we will provide it for you," Stokley repeated several times during the agents' visit. He explained that although True Health undertook the AIDS study because previous clinical AIDS trials had not involved nutrition, they had not expected a showing of such magnitude.
At first, the FDA officials insisted that True Health's nutritional study had been released too soon; they also expressed concern over the amount of money True Health was charging test patients for the product. Stokley told them it was being supplied free of cost, as were the medical tests and Dr. Pulse's services. Whereupon, the investigators decided that the nutritional supplement should be classified as a drug since it was a possible "cure" for AIDS. Ken Davis asked Stokley if he wanted to proceed with a drug classification, but Stokley immediately declined. To designate True Health's nutritional product a drug would be as ludicrous as writing a prescription for Vitamin C. Moreover, it takes about twelve years and $231 million--from synthesis to approval--of a new drug. AIDS patients could not wait twelve years for the government to approve a non-toxic nutritional supplement. Even if Stokley had wanted to have True Health's product classified as a drug, his small company could never have afforded the exorbitant funds.
Stokley presented the agents with True Health's test results, and requested, once again, for the FDA's assistance so that they could "begin saving lives." Ken Davis replied that whatever worked was fine with him--he didn't care if True Health used peanut hulls in its product.
Davis was determined to talk Stokley into classifying the nutritional supplement as a drug; he even claimed that a couple of items in True Health's supplement could cause the product to be designated as a drug. When Stokley continued to resist, Davis retreated to his original contention, that thirty patients were not enough to consider True Health's test a "good study." Exasperated, Stokley explained how the patients' overall conditions had improved, that Dr. Pulse believed ten of the patients would be dead by now if they had not been taking the product.
After scanning a list of all the ingredients in True Health's product, Inspector Davis spotted an unlabeled bottle of aloe vera and said it would have to be embargoed, ostensibly because it wasn't properly licensed by the State of Texas. Stokley offered to set aside the aloe until it was properly labeled, but Davis insisted the embargoed aloe would have to be destroyed. He offered to send Stokley a licensing application for future use. Stokley protested--in his previous experiences with the FDA, it took months to get anything done. The aloe vera was only being used in the test; it was not being sold. He was concerned that the balance of 180-day test might be interrupted. The FDA officers laughed, saying it wasn't their problem. Seemingly determined to obstruct True Health's AIDS test, the agents detained 283 quart bottles of aloe vera juice until February 2, 1990--exactly six months later.
A few days later, Joel Martinez showed up at Dr. Pulse's clinic in Grand Prairie, Texas. As he browsed through AIDS test patients' files, he told Dr. Pulse and his assistant, Elizabeth Uhlig: "It is against God's law to save those gays." Martinez later repeated the exact same statement to Stokley. Trying to appeal to an iota of decency that the inspector might have, Stokley asked him about the innocent children and adults who were contracting AIDS through blood transfusions. Our representative from the Food and Drug Administration shrugged, "In a war there are always innocent casualties."
Source: http://www.fdainformation.com/
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 19:00 |
FDA scientists were questioned about the potential health hazards genetically modified (GM) foods would have. Previously secret documents attained by the Alliance for Bio-Integrity’s 1998 lawsuit reveal that our food experts were very concerned that GM foods carried “serious health hazards.” They unofficially concluded that GM foods lead to “different risks” for consumers than untreated foods. However, official the official policy came to the opposite conclusion, and even went on to claim that there were no significant differences. This ruling allowed for the companies producing GM foods to release their products to market without official testing.
These advances for GM foods through the FDA were headlined by Michael Taylor- whose previous employment was a Monsanto attorney. In July of this year, Obama appointed Taylor as America’s food safety czar.
There is a general concensus that the recent rise in some chronic illnesses – such as asthma, autism, diabetes, allergies, and accellerated aging – seems to correlate with the consumption of GM foods. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine conducted animal studies that found similiar results. Dr. P. M. Bhargava reviewed 600 scientific journals and concluded the same. Eight international experts looked over the evaluations of GM food safety by private GM companies and created a report detailing how these companies have “systematically overlook[ed] the side effects,” and underestimated “the initial signs of diseases like cancer and diseases of the hormonal, immune, nervous and reproductive systems, among others.”
We aren’t given the chance to be represented by a group of publicly elected officials on a matter that effects the whole nation. That being the case, we must take the responsibility to alert our peers of the potential health hazards of GM foods. Without consumers, major GM companies like a Monsanto won’t have the means to wend their products into the general populace’s homes.
Source:
http://bytestyle.tv/content/secret-fda-memos-reveal-concerns-about-genetically-modified-foods-gmos
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
Written by Enviroadmin
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 18:57 |
The obnoxious institution that is "America's Food and Drug administration" has once again triumphed over Natural Drug-Free Healing.
This is the same FDA that wants to outlaw Organic Foods, that wants to remove Vitamins of all shelves in America and make sure that you solely rely on their designer drugs which they approve and enforce on the people on behalf of the insidious American Drug Companies.
Write to the FDA on -
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Article sourced from:
http://www.rifewiki.org/wiki/Jim_Folsom_Trial
Background
"The Royal Rife Research Society" [1] was originally started by a scientist called Janet Fleming/Kimberly Bailey (she used both names, called Kimberly in this article) who designed and patented the original Astropulse device recommended by RRRS. Kimberly has links back to John Crane and Royal Raymond Rife.
To make a long horrible story short, a San Diego private investigator called Richard Post allegedly went missing and was presumed murdered. Kimberly was accused of helping to organize his kidnapping and torture. Although Kimberly was acquitted by the jury for Conspiracy to Commit Murder, the judge for this case overruled the jury and gave Kimberly a life sentence plus 10 years. She was never able to appeal and died in prison on August 30th, 2008. The case however was not linked to her “Rife” business.
Jim Folsom is currently the successive rights holder of the Astropulse Rife unit that Kimberly designed and marketed. Jim took over the distribution of the Astropulse unit, and built up a business selling bio-resonance frequency instruments including the Global Wellness, Biosolutions, and of course the Astropulse. He ran his business successfully with high ethical values from 1995 to just before his trial.
The Name: Jim Anderson
While Jim was working for Kimberly Bailey as an employee, she insisted that everyone working for her use a business name for customer enquiries. Jim therefore used the name "Jim Anderson" for customer enquires only. Even during this time, Jim always used his real name for all contacts with government, banking, businesses, conferences, FDA, accounts, etc. and finally dropped the name "Jim Anderson" completely in 2002, about a ýear before he was raided by the FDA. [2]
FDA Letter to James Anderson
On Nov. 28, 2000, an FDA warning letter[3] was sent to "James Anderson" at the address of Dr. Stan Wellington (now deceased) in Florida, who ran a company called "International Medical Research Groups". A person called "James Anderson" was working for Dr. Stan Wellington at the time, but this person had no connection and was not related in any way with Jim Folsom.
Stan ran two websites: e-bestsolutions.com[4] and internationalcures.com[5] which were both taken offline after Stan had communicated with the FDA about this issue.
Jim Folsom had nothing to do with that company, he has never been to Florida and was not associated with Stan's company in any way.
Stan did send a copy of the letter to Jim Folsom to look at and this copy was near his desk when Jim was raided in 2003. This issue was raised at the trial and completely resolved. The FDA employee who wrote the letter was present at the trial and admitted it related to Stan's websites and not to Jim Folsom in any way.
Operation Cure All Raid in April 2003
Although Jim Folsom, did not receive a letter from the FDA in advance, his company was raided in April 2003 under “Operation Cure All”, run by the FDA/FTC and U.S. Postal Service alliance. A lot of equipment, including over 500 instruments as well as many office records were confiscated, and Jim and his wife were shocked and terrorized by the many men who came into their house with guns [6].
Nothing happened for several years - no charges or anything else. Then, within a week of the statute of limitations taking effect, Jim was arrested and charged with many felony counts including selling a class III medical instrument without a license. Jim, despite being offered a plea bargain whereby he would plead guilty to a misdemeanor, pay a $250 fine, not sell his devices for one year, and be under (unsupervised) probation for one year, decided to fight it and go to trial.
Jim was convinced he would be considered not guilty, and knowing just what his devices can do for the human body and being the principled man he is, felt certain he could fight this charge and win. He saw it as an opportunity to clear the Rife name once and for all, and increase the possibilities for moving his instruments into the public’s hands where they belong!
Claim that Jim Folsom Earned $8 million
One of the claims made by the prosecution, both in court and publically in press releases, is that James Folsom earned about $8 million from the sale of electrotherapy devices.
The Prosecution came up with this figure, where a considerable amount of which applied to sales made by Jim's associate Gabino Palafox although he was acting and selling frequency instruments entirely independently from Jim. All sales of such devices (including those made by Gabina Palafox) were presented as if they were all made by Jim. Costs were however not deducted from that figure and after manufacturing, accessories, manuals, brochures, literature printing, shipping, advertising, "R & D and legal expenses (both significant)", under fixed and variable costs, there was not that much remaining when considering most of these frequency instruments went out to distributors, mostly at little profit margin.
There were pressures from distributors to raise the retail cost higher to allow for greater marketing expense allowances and distributor downline profit margin, etc., however Jim resisted in order to keep the cost as affordable as possible to most users. His profit margins from marketing instruments to primary distributors was marginal with the idea to get as many instruments out to end users as possible, helping as many people as possible, as well the intent to expand "market" awareness significantly.
Is there a lot of money stashed away as the Prosecution claims? - According to Jim Folson: "No, certainly not - my wife certainly wishes this were so."
Jim Folsom’s Trial, Feb 4-17, 2009
Jim was arrested for selling a class III medical instrument without FDA pre market approval/clearance. The charges that Jim thought he was being charged with and for which he built his case was:
1. Fraud against the government
2. Misbranding/Mislabeling/Adulteration
3. Fraud against customers (added by the prosecuting attorney and allowed by the judge a couple of days into the trial)
The FDA automatically classifies a device as a Class III device until its review and re-evaluation to a Class I, II or III device.
A "declaration" of exemption under the "grandfather" clause of the 1976 CCFD Act can be made as was the case of Kimberly Bailey in the late 1980's under FDA Commissioner Frank Young, approx. the time he was leaving the FDA. All follow-up requests by her to the FDA were met with failure. This was testified to by trial defense witness Jay Walker who assisted Bailey in all the declaration supporting documents, assembling and reading for certified mailing. Although there was the certainty of the mailing Walker did not accompany Bailey to the Post Office and therefore could not testify to the absolutely certainty of the mailing. Jim Folsom has reviewed many of the Bailey writings and talked with Walker and is certain of the postal mailing - these were most credible people.
Why should Jim be not guilty of all charges?
Jim ought to have been found not guilty of all charges because of six major things; the May 28 1976 Cosmetic, Food and Drug (devices) Act, battery operation, stacks of testimonials, no harmful side effects, no dissatisfied customers, and stellar business practices.
1. The Food and Drug Administration May 28 1976 Medical Device Regulation Act (PL 94-295) [7] : This Act amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the safety and effectiveness of medical devices intended for human use and other purposes. It says “Before such a product can be marketed, it must undergo premarket approval or it must be reclassified into Class I or Class II, unless (1) it can be shown to be substantially equivalent (SE) to a device that was in commercial distribution prior to May 28, 1976, … Jim’s device should have been “grandfathered” in under this because Royal Raymond Rife and crew were selling these devices back in the 1940s and 50’s (way before 1976), and Jim had documentation of equivalent functionality. This could easily be proven the following ways:
1. The Dr. Robert Stafford interviews and research documents: Jim’s attorneys requested everything the government had on the 50 plus years on Rife. That should have included the Dr. Robert Stafford interviews and research documents from his work in the 1960s, but did not. An FDA agent contacted Stafford and wanted to take the Rife frequency instrument that he had and Dr. Stafford said No, but he agreed to allow the FDA to take all his research work. They returned it months later, and an interview of Dr. Robert Stafford is included in the Jason Ringas and Shawn Montgomery DVD “The Rise and Fall of a Scientific Genius” 
2. Devices that should have been “grandfathered” in Jim’s warehouse: At the Murphy Cannon Road storage (where they took Jim’s 500 plus instruments from) were two Rife devices manufactured in 1944. One of the Rife devices was 4-ft high, 4 ft wide, and 30 inches deep, and during the closing rebuttal Pierson presented a picture exhibit that showed a picture of Jim’s warehouse with the device. Both devices had been in commercial use and with them were documents revealing similar and equivalent use for the Astropulse unit. Copies of these documents had been sent by Kim Bailey to the FDA commissioner in the 1980s at the time Frank Young. Kim never received a response back from the commissioner, even after several follow-up inquiries. She sent that package as a declaration of exemption, and these materials ought to have been included in the discovery. Pierson was ordered by the court to come up with full discovery on all evidence taken in Jim’s April 2003 raids several times in the summer 2008 pre-hearings, however she did not come up with full discovery through obstruction and delays and the result was Jim’s defense never got these items they needed.
3. Jim included in his instrument sales 2 DVDs. One was all about Royal Raymond Rife, the microscope he invented, and his frequency research and results. It included pictures of media announcements, letters to Rife from doctors high up in the medical establishment, and pictures of Rife’s equipment. The other DVD contained video-taped testimonials. Two DVD's were submitted as evidence by the Prosecution - Benice and Negrete were very surprised that they were. Had the jurors been permitted to view the video contents there would no doubt been a whole different outcome to the trial. They were apparently submitted because of having been shipped as part of the contents with the devices. The Prosecutor was then able then to get the Judge to block the jurors from viewing them - # 1, the Rife documentary and # 2, User testimonials.
4. Device is exempt under under the statute. According to a planned Expert Opinion Testimony, that was unfortunately not presented by the defense, Ralph Fucetola JD states: "Under current law, intent determines status. Your intent, as you expressed it to me, is clearly not to provide “treatment of disease” but rather to provide compatible, frequency controlled energy that may be beneficial to normal structure and function. However, your written materials may not have clearly reflected that intent and are not so artfully drafted as to express your true intent. Nonetheless, your Disclaimers and Disclosures are sufficient to appraise the user of the intent that the Device be used as a non-medical device. Under these circumstances, it is my opinion that the Device does not need to be registered under the statute as a “medical device” as it is exempt. The most appropriate Disclaimer would be, “Not intended to treat disease, support or sustain human life, or to prevent impairment of human health; for frequency delivery, self-education and research purposes only.” [9]
2. Battery operation. Apparently, if a device runs on a 9-volt battery it is exempt from needing to go through the licensing process. Jim’s manuals state his device can be run by a cigarette lighter/9 volt adapter. This is considered a viable battery substitute. Two FDA officials testified for the prosecution, and Jim’s attorney cross-examined them asking if this is an exemption factor and they admitted yes, there was exemption. However this was never pursued during the trial by the defense attorneys.
3. Stacks of testimonials. Jim has been collecting testimonials for years and has stacks of them. However, this material was not allowed to be presented during the trial. Pierson requested it be blocked and the judge allowed it.
4. No harmful side effects. In the many years that the Rife technology has been used, there haven’t been any harmful side effects reported. Yet this was not allowed to be brought up in court.
5. No dissatisfied customers. Jim was very careful running his business for many years taking great care to see that all his customers were completely satisfied, and he is not aware of any dissatisfied customers. Yet this was not allowed to be brought up in court.
6. Stellar business practices. Jim interacted with many other Rife-type device manufacturers and customers, and his reputation is stellar. During the trial the prosecution brought in 24 of his fellow distributors and friends to testify against Jim during seven days of prosecution, but every one of them had nothing but praise for Jim’s business practices and character. The prosecution used that against Jim saying he was such a brilliant fraud that he was a danger to the community because his peers and customers weren’t even aware they’d been defrauded.
What happened at the trial?
Jim was very upbeat throughout the preparations, and during the trial. However, after seven days of the prosecution bringing witnesses to the stand, Jim’s attorneys then called only two and the defense took less than ½ an hour on the morning of the eighth day all the while telling Jim the witnesses for the prosecution, who were mostly Jim’s distributors, were doing a great job of telling how great a guy Jim was…honest, forthright an all around good guy…that they did not have to call any more witnesses than the two for the defense. Obviously the Jury would not find him guilty. Some of Jim’s friends attending the trial became very worried because they got the impression that his attorneys were not defending him or they would have been asking for documents that should have been produced for the Discovery Process and following the strategy agreed upon (as much as possible) outlined above.
The trial resumed after a long holiday weekend, and on Tuesday, February 17th the proceedings included closing arguments by the prosecution (Pierson’s assistant U.S. attorney), followed by closing arguments by the defense (Jeff Bernice) followed by rebuttal by Pierson. Pierson’s rebuttal included stories where (Jim’s quote) “all bounds of truth were completely disregarded. Fabrication and deceit to the jury had no bounds.” Logic would say the defense would have the chance for a counter-rebuttal, but procedure does not allow it. Jim was absolutely shocked and asked Jeff Bernice why not. His answer? Because the government is allowed to present its case beyond a shadow of a doubt. In other words allows lies and fabrications! Judge Houston gave the jury instructions for 30 minutes and they took about 2 hours to come up with a conviction. They had boxes of evidence to look through but because of the short deliberation time some would conclude they did not. So, what they had to make a decision on was really the overwhelming lies of Pierson’s rebuttal, and in the end Jim was found guilty of (surprise!) 26 felony charges (despite being told up to and during the trial it was only three), which allowed for a possible maximum sentence of 140 years in prison and $500,000.00 in fines. Being found guilty on twenty six charges was a total surprise for both Jim and his attorneys. [10] [11]
The San Diego Union-Tribune newspaper reported on Thursday, February 19th about the seriousness of the charges. This was the first information that family, friends and associates got as to what Jim Folsom was facing. [12]
As stated earlier, Jim stood on his principles for his innocence and to clear the Rife name. It was an impossible task. Jim was up against an endless supply of money through the FDA and an unjust system. Research has found since Jim’s conviction that our Juridical System is more of a money machine than Big Pharma & the Medical Industrial Complex. [13] [14]
There are links to the KGB and FBI operatives in Jim’s case just as there was with the Kimberly Bailey case. In the end he and many of those who were following his trial were SHOCKED to find out he had been found guilty of all charges.
Since the trial, Jim’s defense attorneys had promised to present a motion for a new trial but Jim is not aware of that happening. Jim also provided them with money at the end of the trial for the transcripts but that money was not used for the intended purpose as of this writing. The transcripts are necessary to put together a motion for a new trial and it takes 30 days. Jim also mentioned he’s being pressured into signing a plea agreement.
The outcome of this could set a precedent for other rife-type device inventor/distributors, and things must be set right. There is a group working on getting Jim out of jail.
Motion for Dismissal of Counsel
As Jim felt his own defense counsel did not properly defend him in court, and Jim no longer has enough funds for a new counsel, he has made an application to defend himself in court. This was discussed in court on July 17, 2009[15]. After an approximate 20 minute sidebar discussion, Jim has been given 30 days by the judge to come up with new attorneys, media was present, as well as approximately 20 friends and family.
The local NBC news camera was outside and a reporter was taking notes and a Courtroom artist did a sketch[16]
Court Hearing - August 20, 2009
Jim had a court hearing on August 20th - focus of which was dismissal of current counsel and to appoint new counsel. Dismissal of current counsel was granted, but a federally appointed public defender has not yet been granted because of prosecutor AUSA opposition. Jim is financially strapped, but this was opposed on the grounds that the financial affidavit Jim entered was not correct. This is based on AUSA's opinion that Jim Folsom made 9 million dollars and didn’t show it as an asset. An investigation is being conducted to verify this.
Jim and his support group have requested new counsel be John Kirby[17]. Mr. Kirby has been tentatively assigned as new counsel once the financial investigation has been completed. Mr. Kirby does not appear to know anything about frequency devices, but support group representatives and Jim have met with him several times already and are 100% in agreement this is a good choice. Kirby’s office is very close to the detention center (only several blocks away), and he seems to be willing to put the time in the case that it needs. Another meeting with Kirby was held on 9/9/9.
Motions that were filed in between counsel
During the period of time when Jim’s counsel and he decided to part ways and before new counsel had been assigned, Jim filed several motions. However, motions can only be filed by the defendant if he has been granted permission by the judge to represent himself (“pro se”) which had not been done. So, the judge “lodged” these motions, which basically means to just hold or pend them until new counsel has been appointed and then Jim and his counsel can decide what to do with them. If they determine to move forward with them, the new counsel must submit them to the court using proper procedure.
Motions on the way
Motions that Jim and the support group expect to be first on the agenda are: motion to dismiss, motion for a mistrial, motion for a new trial, motion for discovery of evidence, and motion not to destroy evidence. These motions have been well thought out and expressed in writing.
Hearing on September 21, 2009
A hearing with the judge took place on September 21h, 2009, 9AM at the courthouse. During this court hearing, the judge allowed the appointment of John Kirby as Jim's new counsel and with that he asked the court to release Jim on bond. The Gov't attorney-AUSA opposed that and the judge did not let Jim out.
Mr Kirby will file a formal request for release, a new trial and a motion to not destroy evidence. He is going to pursue immediately for the trial transcripts - all evidence that AUSA has was offered to Kirby at the end of the hearing - all the records the previous counsel has.
Hearing on November 30, 2009
In a hearing at 9:00am on November 30th 2009, Judge Houston ordered Jim to be released on bail. The prosecution put in a motion to have the release reconsidered. Jim was given a choice of either (#1) the US attorney will sign off on Jim's bond release on condition he agrees not to seek bail at the appeal phase or (#2) AUSA will file a motion to appeal bail, but this would be filed with the 9th Circuit Court the appellate court and that would delay release for Jim for maybe 6 months if not 12 while the appeal goes forth. The prosecution was doing all they could to hurt Jim with this. Jim's attorney John Kirby talked to the main US Attorney for a long time about the prosecution's plans and it was determined that the first option (#1) was the only other choice. Jim agreed to the #1 and this was submitted to record the approved Lien and the approval to the Judge.
The prosecution put in an interlocutory appeal[18] in an attempt to block Jim's release.
Jim Folsom Released on Bail December 18 2009
On December 18th 2009 8:00PM after 10 months of imprisonment Jim Folsom has been released on bail as ordered by Judge Houston.
Jim Folsom Sentencing, February 1 and 8, 2010
Note: This is a preliminary report while the main report in being prepared and it may contain inaccuracies.
The sentencing was spread over two days as time was insufficient on the first day. After much deliberation over relevancy of Sentencing Guidelines, they were deemed not usable. Also the well worn issue of victims got put down as the Judge stated how many of the letters mentioned actual benefits and no vulnerable victims as such, no stealing. He also said ”providing product they wanted.” The Judge also stated the FDA had not kept pace with alternative medicine – The FDA needs to catch up.
The final outcome was 51 months starting April 2nd with time served being taken into account. There was also a $250,000 fine and 3 year probation served.
The Judge did ok the destruction of evidence but it is to be held until through the appeal stage. An appeal will be filed in the next 10 days.
This section will be updated again shortly.
Character References
The following character references have been provided about Jim Folsom and submitted to the court:
Adam Brodwolf: File:20090611 Adam's C Letter.pdf
Caroline R. Flory File:20090609 Caroline C Letter.pdf
Cindy Charlebois: File:20090602 Cindy C Letter.pdf
Emmitt Luttrell: File:20090609 Emmett C Letter.pdf
Keith F. Scott: File:20090610 Kieth C Letter.pdf
Peter Walker: File:20090615 Peter C Letter.pdf
New Character references released for final sentencing in Febuary 2010
Richard Loyd: File:20102020 Richard Loyd.pdf
Terese Buchanan: File:20100204 Terese Buchanan C Letter.pdf
Ralph Fucetola JD: File:20100202 Ralph Fucetola JD.pdf
Peter Walker: File:20100207 Peter C Letter.pdf (updated extended version of previous character reference)
San Francisco Tesla Society: File:20100205 SFTS.pdf
Research opinion review of the United States vs James Folsom
Ralph Fucetola JD, who runs the Vitamin Lawyer Consultancy[19] wrote his "Research opinion review of the United Stated vs James Folsom" on 02/21/2010: File:20100221 AcA Ralph F. Grandfather-opinion ltr.pdf
In this document, he investigates: "Is there a hidden motive why the FDA denies the existence of any predicate Rife type device? That is, a Rife device that will qualify frequency devices for “significantly equivalent frequency device” status under the “grandfather clause” of the May 28, 1976 Congressional – Cosmetic, Food and Drug (Devices) Act (1976 CCFD Act)?"
Appeal for Help
An appeal has been started for those who wish to do what you can to help Jim. Those wishing to help are asked to do the following:
Donate!
It will cost upwards of $75,000 to put in an appeal, and Jim has exhausted his funds and needs help. Any bit will do. If you can only afford $5 or $10, that will still help! Jim’s brother David and his good friend Rob have started up a website for Jim including instructions on how to donate at http://www.jimfolsom.net
Write!
Tell writers about this story! We need the media now. We need stories about what is happening to this innocent man and that Americans are being lied to about cures. Blog. Write letters to the editor. The truth needs to be heard now!!!
Talk
Talk to your friends and family! Jim Folsom needs your/our help to avoid a prison sentence. One way is to politically get attention by many speaking out in the weeks ahead.
Publicize the Case
The defense team needs to communicate this story and has been asking for help! They have stated that it is important to get the word out about Jim’s devices and his predicament to the public. There were some pertinent health-related articles in the wall-street journal recently [20] [21] [22].
Those who know an American radio talk-show host or a newspaper writer or a web-site blogger that might be willing to work with Jim's support group, please contact them via the Rife Research Group [23]
How Will This Affect Other Rife Distributors in the USA?
The FDA claims this type of instrument is under its jurisdiction regardless of the fact that they were used many years before the 1976 Act and should not require a license to distribute. This seems to be the background and big picture of this case. The big question is how this will affect others who sell instruments but are more careful not to make any statements regarding efficacy? It will put major anxiety on those selling these devices.
Also (most likely as a result of the trial) just 45 days after trial, the FDA put out a press announcement “FDA to Review Medical Devices Marketed Prior to 1976” [24]
Most distributors of Rife equipment in the USA are now checking the information they are releasing on their websites.
The Rife Forum as Possible Solution for Informing About Rife Technology!
As the Rife Forum [25] is based in Germany, where Rife devices can be sold and used legally, the forum has been suggested as a possible solution for manufactures of Rife devices.
According to German law, medical equipment manufactures may openly present and discuss their equipment within a closed specialized forum. With over 6000 members who specifically joined to learn about Rife technology, this constitutes a significant highly targeted way of reaching those interested in Rife technology. The forum, and its associated Rife Research, Europe [26] and Rife Wiki [27] websites can be used to educate the public about the background to Royal Rife.
The Rife Handbook by Nenah Sylver, PhD [28] can be recommended to those who need a detailed reference work covering Rife therapy including a detailed Frequency Directory (also available separately [29])
Instead of publishing information about Rife on their own websites, that may be problematic in the USA, they can simply point their customers to the Rife Forum, etc. to learn about such issues and concentrate on giving technical and pricing info, etc. on their own sites.
Considering the increasingly critical legal issues to other companies marketing electrotherapy equipment, a strategic alliance with the Rife Forum may be the best solution.
Companies interested in discussing the options available should contact the forum admin [30]
Write to the FDA on -
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Read 0 Comments... >> |
|
